Very basic philosophy of values

Very basic philosophy of values



Values ​​are generally misunderstood as always good


Yle:


" Stubb is known for the value-based realism he brought to Finland's foreign policy as a guideline. When talking about peace being brokered to Ukraine through a confusing process, the conflict between values ​​and realism is obvious. "


It is a philosophical mistake to say "a conflict between values ​​and realism".


Because even though one can talk about the fact that realism and certain intended values ​​are in conflict - that does not justify saying in general terms - that realism and values ​​are in conflict.


Why.


Because Europe values ​​that Ukraine survives the war as an independent state without losing its territories - while Putin values ​​that Ukraine loses its independence.


Both are values ​​- but they have different ethics.


Therefore, one cannot say that realism and values ​​are in conflict - but rather one must say - realism and ethics are in conflict - and for example list the values ​​to which ethics refers there.


So, according to the ethical realism I have developed, it is as follows - that:


THERE ARE VALUES AND THEIR IMPLEMENTATION AS REALISM ACCORDING TO IT - WHAT IS THE ETHICS OF THE SETTER OF VALUES.


This is a universally valid rule and measure of humanity, no matter where in the world it is.


Jussi Vaarala


Developer of the ethical-realistic philosophy

Kommentit

Tämän blogin suosituimmat tekstit

Searching instrumentalist to be feat artist to my improvisations

Pelkällä urheilukentän päällysteen hinnalla saisi joka kuntaan ostettua aktiivisille kulttuurinharrastajille omat tilat